Where did Hume write about miracles?

Where did Hume write about miracles?

Where did Hume write about miracles?

Hume therefore lays out, in the second part of section X, a number of reasons that we have for never holding this condition to have been met. He first claims that no miracle has in fact had enough witnesses of sufficient honesty, intelligence, and education.

What is Hume's view on God?

Hume argues that an orderly universe does not necessarily prove the existence of God. Those who hold the opposing view claim that God is the creator of the universe and the source of the order and purpose we observe in it, which resemble the order and purpose we ourselves create.

When did Hume write on miracles?

This argument has evoked an enormous amount of discussion, both criticising the argument and endorsing the argument. It started right after the publication of Of Miracles and is still going on. Hume 1748 is the text where Hume presents the argument. Earman 2000 is a rather technical thorough criticism of the argument.

When did Hume publish of miracles?

The locus classicus for modern and contemporary philosophical discussion of miracles is Chapter X ("Of Miracles") of David Hume's Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding, first published in 1748.

What did Hume say about miracles?

Hume states that a miracle is “a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent”. By this, Hume means to suggest that a miracle is a breaking of a law of nature by the choice and action of a God or supernatural power.

Did Locke believe in God?

God. Like many of his English contemporaries, Locke was deeply interested in matters of faith and religion. ... Although knowledge of God is vital for human life and practical conduct, on Locke's view, it cannot be grounded legitimately on the supposedly universal possession of an innate idea.

What did Hume say about miracles and religion?

  • Hume thinks that they cannot, and indeed that no rational person would base belief in God on testimony that miracles have occurred. He says: “...therefore we may establish it as a maxim, that no human testimony can have such force as to prove a miracle, and make it a just foundation for any system of religion.” (88) This is Hume’s conclusion.

What was the main argument of David Hume?

  • Hume supported his primary argument with four supporting claims: No miracle has been attested by a sufficient number of educated and rational witnesses. There is a human tendency to believe the spectacular. Most reports of miracles occur among ignorant and barbarous people.

Why did Ronald Nash believe that David Hume believed in Miracles?

  • One important facet of Hume’s treatment of miracles concerns his metaphysical belief. Ronald Nash believes that Hume, much like Kant, was trying to make room for faith during an epoch of history that was rapidly losing belief in God. This led Nash to believe that Hume was at least a deist.

Why are miracles a problem for the believer?

  • The problem for the believer in miracles is that miracles, being departures from the laws of nature, seem to be exactly the sorts of events which we should not expect to happen. As Hume puts it:

Related Posts: